OSHA INSPECTIONS: What To Expect And How To Prepare
In 2014, 4,679 individuals were killed while working in the United States – an equivalent of 3.3 fatalities per 100,000 full-time workers and more than 13 deaths per day.1 Obviously, workplace safety is a major concern. To ensure safe and healthful working conditions, in 2014, there were 36,163 federal the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) inspections and 47,217 State Plan OSHA inspections.2
In order to assure that the OSHA standards are complied with, on-site employer inspections are conducted by Compliance Safety and Health Officers (“CSHO”) and, except in limited circumstances, the employer has no advance notice of the inspection.3 Inspections target imminent danger, catastrophes and fatalities, worker complaints and referrals, severe violators, and high injury or illness rates.4
This bulletin will provide an overview of the inspection process and highlight some employer strategies and procedures to implement before, during, and after the inspection.
I. When does OSHA conduct inspections
As a preliminary matter, is important to understand when OSHA conducts an inspection. Inspections can be random, because of an employee complaint, or sparked by special emphasis programs. In fiscal year 2014, OSHA conducted 36,163 federal inspections, of which 9,570 related to employee complaints.5 It is therefore critical that employers have an internal mechanism for managing employee complaints, as this would encourage employees to handle the matter internally, rather than by filing an OSHA complaint. Furthermore, employers should stay abreast of national and local special emphasis programs that may apply to them as this increases the likelihood of inspection. For example, nationally, OSHA has several special emphasis programs focusing on, federal agencies and hazardous machinery.6 In California, featured safety programs including those focusing on longshoring activity and retail facilities.
II. Pre-inspection precautions and strategies
a. Establish employee responsibilities
In order to facilitate an efficient and minimally invasive inspection, employers must ensure that employees are aware of their roles and responsibilities should a CSHO arrive for an inspection. Best practices provide that the employer establish an “inspection team” comprised of individuals with distinct responsibilities during the inspection. At a minimum, management should identify who is responsible for meeting with the CSHO, who will be the primary contact person for the CSHO, and who will be present during the inspection. Because the employer has the right to mimic any tests performed by the CSHO, the employer should designate an individual responsible for doing so. Further, it is helpful if the employer also designate a member of maintenance or the facilities department for OSHA inspections. Should the individual identify any easily remedied violation during the walkthrough, he/she would be able to abate the violation during the course of the inspection, thereby lessening the chance of a citation.
b. Identify an individual responsible for maintaining potentially relevant records
The employer should also ensure that someone is designated with the task of maintaining certain records that are of critical importance during an OSHA inspection, including: training records, OSHA logs, internal audit documents, and third party audit documents.
On a related note, it is important that the employer stay current on the OSHA recordkeeping and reporting requirements.8 As of January 1, 2015, all employers are subject to certain reporting requirements, even those exempt from OSHA recordkeeping requirements. As of January 1, 2015, OSHA has revised its recordkeeping regulations to partially exempt new industries.9
Furthermore, training records can be essential evidence when the employer seeks to establish an affirmative defense based on unpreventable employee misconduct, discussed later. If the employer has performed internal safety audits or has had a third-party safety audit performed, it is imperative that the employer address and abate any safety issues identified. In practice, it is nearly guaranteed that the CSHO will request these documents during the course of the inspection and track abatements. Where applicable, any invoices or documentations related to the abatements should be retained by the employer. If the inspection reveals that an internal or third-party audit identified a safety violation that was not abated, the employer can be subject to penalties for a willful violation.
III. During the inspection
Throughout the course of the inspection, remember: it is your facility and you have rights concerning the inspection process. The CSHO must conduct the inspection in a manner that is not unreasonably disruptive. In general, the inspection will begin with an Opening Conference, which is followed by a walkthrough, interviews, and a Closing Conference.
a. Opening Conference 11
At this point, the CSHO will explain the scope and purpose of the inspection. The CSHO will likely request documentation from the employer. Note that the OSHA standards set forth the records the employer is required to provide.12 Therefore, it is sometimes important that management consult with the company’s OSHA counsel before providing documents to the CSHO, in order to avoid inadvertently disclosing more information than necessary. The Opening Conference is an opportunity for the employer to notify the CSHO of any trade secret issues and for the officer to gain an understanding of the employer’s operation and safety standards. While this should be an open dialogue, it is important that the employer does not reveal more information than necessary thereby avoiding the possibility that the CSHO is provided with information that can be used against the employer.
The facilities walkthrough can take anywhere from a couple of hours to a couple of months depending on the size and complexities of the facility and safety standards. As previously noted, the employer has the right to accompany the inspector.13 In this, if the inspectors intend to take photographs or hire experts for testing, the employer has the right to do the same. If there are any discrepancies noted between the results of the CSHO expert or employer expert, the discrepancies should be immediately documented and addressed. If the employer requires that employees complete certain training programs prior to being allowed access to the facilities, then the employer has the right to require that the CSHO complete the training as well. Furthermore, if the facility safety standards restrict the use of photography or the introduction of chemicals necessary for expert testing, then the CSHO is precluded from violating these standards.14 For example, the facility may restrict flash photography as there would be an adverse chemical reaction in the plant; if this is the case, the CSHO may not violate this safety standard and is precluded from photographing the area.
Even more, the employer has the right to protect their trade secrets.15 Since the OSHA reports are discoverable to the general public, the employer has certain rights concerning their trade secrets that they should be aware of so that they can protect their trade secrets during the inspection.
c. Interviews 16
The inspection process will oftentimes include employee interviews. In order to ensure minimal business and productivity interruption, the employer should schedule these interviews away from the production floor. These inspections are conducted in private, however, the employee may request a union representative be in attendance. Further, the CSHO will typically seek to document the discussion through an Interview Statement that is signed by the interviewee. The employee/interviewee should carefully review the statement before signing.
d. Closing Conference 17
At this conference, the CSHO will explain violations noted during the walkthrough inspection. Although it might be tempting for employers to explain or discuss the violations with CSHO, employers should be careful not to inadvertently provide the CSHO with information that can be used against them by either proposing an unreasonable abatement date or admitting to a violation. This conference can be an important opportunity for the employer to gain free discovery and insight into the CSHO’s findings.
e. Citations and Options
No later than six months after the inspection, a citation may be issued against the employer.18 This citation must describe the violation “with particularity.” 19 Upon receipt of the citation, the employer must post the citation at or near the place of violation for three days or until it is abated, whichever is later.20 The citation will prescribe an abatement deadline; however, if the employer is unable to comply with the deadline, OSHA readily grants extensions.
The citation will indicate a proposed penalty that the employer may accept and pay in full, attempt to informally settle, or file a notice of contest. Of note, the timeframe for filing a notice of contest can vary by state.
f. Common defenses to OSHA citations
i. Lack of Employer Knowledge
In order to establish a violation, OSHA must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that:
- The cited standard applies;
- The employer failed to comply with the standard;
- The employees had access or exposure to the violative condition; and
- Employer had knowledge of the violative condition. 21
The final factor is often decisive. OSHA must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that either: 1) the employer had actual, direct knowledge of the condition; or 2) the employer should have known about the condition through the exercise of reasonable diligence.22 Note that where a supervisor has knowledge of a violation, the knowledge is imputed on the employers to prove a prima facie case.23 Hence, it is imperative that employers train supervisors to conduct review of safety conditions and to report unsafe conditions.
ii. Unpreventable Employee Misconduct
The employer may also raise the “unpreventable employee misconduct” defense.24 Generally, to establish this defense, the employer must prove:
- The employer has safety rules designed to prevent the violation;
- The employer has adequately communicated the safety rules and standards to employees;
- The employer has provided any necessary safety training;
- The employer has taken steps to discover violations of the safety rules and standards; and
- The employer has enforced the rules and standards when violations have been discovered. 25
From a practical standpoint, it is incredibly important that the employer maintains documentation of the above. As described previously, the retention of certain records can be critical in an OSHA inspection. Safety training records, documentation of any abatements of violations identified in internal or third-party audits, and other documents may be helpful in instances where an employer seeks to establish this defense.
Although an OSHA inspection can be a stressful and nerve-wracking experience for any employer, proper preparation can help alleviate the stress and uncertainly of the experience. Employers should ensure that all employees are familiar with the employer’s procedures for OSHA inspections in order to make certain that the inspection process, from beginning to end, is as streamlined and minimally invasive as possible. With proper procedures in place, the employer can ensure that the employer is prepared to comply with the OSHA inspection requirements, while still exercising its rights (through things such as side-by-side testing and protection of trade secrets).
3 29 C.F.R. § 1903.6
10 29 C.F.R. § 1903.7(d)
11 OSHA Instruction, Field Operations Manual, 3(V) Opening Conference (available: https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-159.pdf)
12 29 U.S.C. § 657(c)
13 29 U.S.C. § 657(e)
14 29 C.F.R. § 1903.7(c)
15 29 U.S.C. § 664; 29 C.F.R. § 1903.9
16 OSHA Instruction, Field Operations Manual, 3(VII) Walkaround Inspections (available: https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-159.pdf)
17 OSHA Instruction, Field Operations Manual, 3(VIII) Closing Conference (available: https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-159.pdf)
18 29 U.S.C. § 658(c); 29 C.F.R. § 1903.14(a)
19 29 U.S.C. § 658(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1903.14(b)
20 29 U.S.C. § 658(b); 29 C.F.R. § 1903.16(b)
21 http://www.oshalawupdate.com/2012/10/24/osha-faq-series-faq-2-unpreventable-employee-misconduct-defense/; New York State Elec. & Gas Corp. v. Secretary of Labor (2d Cir. 1996) 88 F.3d 98, 105
22 Id.; Tampa Shipyards Inc. (O.S.H.R.C. Mar. 10, 1992) 15 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) ¶ 1533
23 Tampa Shipyards Inc. (O.S.H.R.C. Mar. 10, 1992) 15 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) ¶ 1533
24 29 C.F.R. § 2200.34
25 P. Gioioso & Sons, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Com'n (1st Cir. 1997) 115 F.3d 100, 109; Cbi Services, Inc. (O.S.H.R.C. Oct. 29, 2001) 19 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) ¶ 1591; Burford's Tree, Inc (O.S.H.R.C. Jan. 8, 2010) 22 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) ¶ 1948; Psp Monotech Indus. (O.S.H.R.C. Aug. 14, 2008) 22 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) ¶ 1303; see also OSHA Instruction, Field Operations Manual, 5(VI) Affirmative Defenses (available: https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-159.pdf)
Chapman, Glucksman, Dean, Roeb & Barger has become a multi-faceted law firm with offices in Los Angeles, Orange County, Sacramento and the Bay Area. Our AV rated firm has diverse practice groups consist of highly skilled, insightful, responsive and pragmatic lawyers who vigorously advocate our client's interests, and secure economical, result-oriented and creative solutions to complex issues.
Glenn T. Barger -
Speaker ADR Mediation/Getting the Job Done – Interactive Workshop, November 18, 2015
Glenn T. Barger and Brian D. Kahn- Co-chairing the ASCDC/CDCMA CD Seminar, December 3, 2015
Glenn T. Barger -
Mr. Barger has recently been appointed President Elect of Association of Southern California Defense Counsel
Greg K. Sabo and Grace A. Nguyen were sucessful in having a MSJ granted in favor of an ER doctor in a medical malpractice case involving large potential damages, complex medical and legal issues.
Lauren S. Kadish has been selected as Co-chair of the ASCDC Young Lawyers Committee 2015.
Ashley H. Verdon has been selected 2015 Super Lawyers Southern California Rising Star.
Thomas L. Halliwell - Speaker, West Coast Casualty Seminar, May 14-15, 2015, Disneyland Hotel. Mr. Halliwell will be speaking on Recent Important Appellate Decisions in California, Nevada and Arizona.
Grace A. Nguyen - Ms. Nguyen was recently appointed President of the Loyola Law School Alumni Board of Governors.
Grace A. Nguyen - Speaker, SCALL on February 27-28, 2015. Ms. Nguyen will be speaking on Social Media and Litigation at the Thriving in the Nework Economy Conference.
Glenn T. Barger and Heather M. Patrick -
CGDRB instrumental in 3-month trial wherein a defense verdict was reached against Fred Adelman, an attorney known for his plaintiffs' work in the construction defect arena, including negligence, SB 800 and fraud causes of action.
Brian D. Kahn and John T. Brazier -
Speakers 2014 Construction Defect Seminar, December 11, 2014 at Hilton, Costa Mesa.
Brian D. Kahn - CGDRB congratulates and welcomes Brian D. Kahn to the partnership.
Ms. Dubow will be presenting an ALI-CLE Seminar on Disability Law February 4, 2015, at 2:00 pm PST, offered through the American Legal Institute Continuing Legal Education.
Mr. Mehta has been selected 2015 Super Lawyers Southern California Rising Star.
Ms. Perkins was recently appointed Board Member to the Friends of the Sacramento Crisis Nurseries. Friends of the Crisis Nurseries is an auxiliary fundraising and public awareness group of the Sacramento Children's Home.
Mr. Barger has been added to the LACBA Litigation Executive Committee.
Mr. Barger has recently been appointed Vice President of Association of Southern California Defense Counsel.
Published Article Los Angeles Daily Journal, Ruling Refines Use of Product Liability Doctrine.
Link to Article
Citrus Heights Office is relocating to 925 Highland Pointe Drive, Suite 450, Roseville, CA 95678.
Richard H. Glucksman – Webinar ALI CLE - Building Green & LEED Certified: Negotiation, Drafting and Execution Strategies
Tuesday, July 28, 2015 | 12:00 — 1:30 p.m. Eastern
Telephone Seminar | Audio Webcast
20th Annual MC Consultants Western Region Construction Litigation And Insurance Coverage Conference, September 17-19, 2014. Mr. Kahn will be moderating the panel “An Overview: Public Works Arbitrations – Across The Western United States”.
Actuary Leadership Forum, Center for Insurance Studies at California State University Fullerton. Mr. Glucksman will be speaking on Construction Casualty Losses.
Link to Article
TBA - Paul T. Hayden, Interim Dean of Loyola Law School, Thomas V. Girardi Professor of Consumer Protection Law.
Paul T. Hayden has been a member of the Loyola Law School faculty since 1995, concentrating his teaching and writing on tort law and legal ethics. After law school he clerked for the Honorable Dorothy W. Nelson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and for the Honorable J. Spencer Letts of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. He is an elected member of the American Law Institute and a member of the American Bar Association’s Center for Professional Responsibility.
October 29, 2015 - Senator Ben Allen, 26th Senate District
Senator Ben Allen, 26th Senate District which consists of the Westside and coastal South Bay communities. Senator Allen serves as chair of the Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee as well as the legislature's Joint Committee on the Arts. He is a member of the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee, the Budget Subcommittee on Education, the Natural Resources and Water Committee, the Transportation and Housing Committee, and the Veterans Affairs Committee. He was born in raised in Santa Monica and previously worked for Richardson & Patel and Bryan Cave.
March 16, 2016 - Erwin D. Chemerinsky, Dean, UC Irvine School of Law
Dean Chemerinsky is the founding Dean of UC Irvine School of Law and a preeminent constitutional scholar. Dean Chemerinsky will be speaking on recent US Supreme Court decisions that affect the Firm’s practice, as well as individuals and businesses.
October 8, 2014 - Jim McDonnell, Los Angeles County Sheriff-Elect
Jim McDonnell Los Angeles County Sheriff-Elect and fomer Chief of Police for the Long Beach Police Department. Sheriff McDonnell served with the Los Angeles Police Department for 29 years and held every rank in the department up to Chief of Staff, second-in-command of the LAPD. He has received numerous community and department awards, including the LAPD’s highest award for bravery, the Medal of Valor.
July 23, 2014 - Matthew Dababneh, California State Assembly, 45th District
Mr. Dababneh serves on the Budget, Rules, Insurance and Governmental Organization, as well as the Budget Subcommittee on Education Finance. Mr. Dababneh previously served as the Chief of Staff for former Congressman Brad Sherman.
March 18, 2014 - Hon. Henry A. Waxman, 33rd Congressional District
Hon. Waxman is the U.S. Representative for California’s 33rd Congressional District and has been serving in Congress since 1975. He is considered to be one of the most influential members of Congress.
January 22, 2014 - Hon. Michael P. Vicencia, Assistant Supervising Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, Southeast District (Long Beach)
Assistant Supervising Judge of the Long Beach Superior Court. Hon. Vicencia was involved in overseeing the construction of the new Long Beach Courthouse, which was accomplished with virtually no public funds.
January 8, 2014 - Jerry Braun, Esq., Officer of The Other Bar, Substance Abuse Expert
The Other Bar is a supporting organization to assist the legal profession in recovery from substance abuse.
October 24, 2013 - Hon. Jackie Lacey, Los Angeles County District Attorney
Hon. Jackie Lacey was sworn in on December 3, 2012 as the 42nd District Attorney of Los Angeles County. She is the first woman and first African-American to serve as LA County’s District Attorney.
April 9, 2013 - Patrick Kelly, Esq., President of State Bar of California
Mr. Kelly is the president of the State Bar of California – the largest state bar in the United States. He took over as the 88th president of the State Bar of California in October 2012. He is a veteran trial lawyer and western regional manager of Wilson Elser.
January 24, 2013 - Justice Victory Chaney, California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District
Justice Chaney is a justice on the Second District, Division Two California Court of Appeal. She worked at the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office for 11 years before her judicial appointment in 1990. She was first appointed to the Los Angeles Municipal Court. In 1994, she was promoted to the Superior Court where she presided until her appointment to the appellate court in 2009
November 1, 2011 - Robert Grace, Esq., Assistant Deputy District Attorney – Major Crimes Unit
Robert “Bobby” Grace is a Deputy District Attorney for Los Angeles County working in the Major Crimes Unit. He jointed the DA’s office in 1988 and has successfully prosecuted over 60 homicide cases, including some of LA’s most heinous and famous, including Chester Turner and the Black Widow Killers.
October 4, 2011 - Hon. Deanell Reece Tacha, Dean, Pepperdine University School of Law and former Judge of the United States Court of Appeal, 10th Circuit
Hon. Tacha was appointed by President Reagan to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit where she served as a circuit judge from 1986-2011. She served as Chief Judge from January 2001 through 2007. She was appointed Dean of the Pepperdine University School of Law in 2011.
December 2, 2010 - Justice Lee Smalley Edmon, California Court of Appeal, 2nd District and Former Presiding Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court
Justice Edmon is the presiding justice of Division Three for the 2nd District Court of Appeal. Justice Edmon previously served as a judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court and served as the Los Angeles Superior Court’s first female presiding judge from 2011 to 2012.
November 11, 2010 - Victor Gold, Dean, Loyola Law School of Los Angeles
Victor Gold was named 16th Dean of Loyola Law School and Senior Vice President of Loyola Marymount University in January 2009 after spending a year as interim dean. He has earned myriad accolades as a legal educator and scholar since he started teaching at Loyola in 1984.
Glenn T. Barger - Speaker ADR Mediation/Getting the Job Done – Interactive Workshop, November 18, 2015read more →
Glenn T. Barger and Brian D. Kahn- Co-chairing the ASCDC/CDCMA CD Seminar, December 3, 2015read more →
Extra Extra By: Richard Glucksman, Esq., Jon A. Turigliatto, Esq. & David A. Napper, Esq. ALL CLAIMS FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS IN RESIDENTIAL…read more →
Disclosure, Disclosure, Disclosure. By: Richard Glucksman, Esq., Jon A. Turigliatto, Esq. & David A. Napper, Esq. A brief reflection regarding the trend…read more →
Richard H. Glucksman – Webinar ALI CLE - Building Green & LEED Certified: Negotiation, Drafting and Execution Strategies Tuesday, July…read more →
Ms. Dubow will be presenting a Webinar with ALI CLE on Employers Beware: Social Media Liability and Proactive Preventive Measures,…read more →
20th Annual MC Consultants Western Region Construction Litigation And Insurance Coverage Conference, September 17-19, 2014. Mr. Kahn will be moderating…read more →